How has the pandemic affected our mental health?

Photo

Author: Luka Račič

#NewsroomEurope

On 31th of December 2019, World Health Organisation was informed of many cases of an unknown cause in Wuhan City, China. Chinese authorities have on 7th of January 2020 identified the cause that was temporarily named 2019-nCoV.

 The COVID-19 pandemic is the greatest crisis of our time, claiming more than 2 million lives and causing the biggest shock to the global economy since World War II. It has unquestionably affected people across the whole globe. The disease itself or the stress, and fear have touched most people in one way or another.

 The pandemic has had a very real and very personal impact on people’s lives. Whether an individual was sick, lost someone they loved to COVID-19, lost their job, or struggled with isolating at home. Each of us was affected differently.

Estimates from a recent study of Global Burden of Disease show that the pandemic has affected the mental health of young people the most and that they are disproportionately exposed to suicidal and self-injurious behavior. It also shows that women were more affected than men and that people with pre-existing physical health problems such as asthma, cancer and heart diseases are more likely to develop symptoms of mental disorders.

As of today, too many people are still unable to get the care and support they need for both pre-existing and emerging mental health conditions. Because they were unable to access direct care, many people sought online support, indicating the urgent need to provide reliable and efficient digital tools that are available and easily accessible.

 Fear, worry, and stress are normal responses to perceived or real threats and moments when we face uncertainty or the unknown. It is therefore normal and understandable that people experience fear cause of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 In addition to the fear of contracting a virus in a pandemic like COVID-19, changes in our daily lives are important, as our movements were limited in support of efforts to contain and slow the spread of the virus. Faced with the new realities of working from home, temporary unemployment, schooling children at home and lack of physical contact with other family members, friends and co-workers, it is important to take care of our mental as well as our physical health.

Viri

  1. https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus#tab=tab_3
  2. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/how-has-the-pandemic-changed-our-behavior
  3. https://www.who.int/news/item/02-03-2022-covid-19-pandemic-triggers-25-increase-in-prevalence-of-anxiety-and-depression-worldwide
  4. https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/stress-coping/cope-with-stress/index.html

 

Disclaimer

The supporting organizations for the production of these articles do not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the supporting organizations cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein

Solidarity

Solidarity

Author: Rui

The year 2020 has been far from the previous years we have been experiencing in our modern society, it was the year when the European solidarity was put to test.

Solidarity has always been receiving considerable collective attention in public debates during the last decade, the reasoning of various crises affecting Europe have put the perception of European solidarity under stress. Even more in the year of 2020 when the whole society was hit with the global pandemic, COVID-19, in which European solidarity became overwhelmed with difficulties. 

The pandemic situation we are still experiencing is causing an economic and social crisis with profound and devastating impact on many families. And, as we know, Europe did everything to quickly respond to the coronavirus crisis and has shown extraordinary solidarity to face the pandemic together and to protect the health of the European citizens.

“Unity is strength” as an official motto of European united countries was especially shown to up live to its expectation when a lot of resilience had to be demonstrated.

The resilience shown by Europe during the year 2020 encourages us to acknowledge the solidity of countries’ united foundations and contribution for European unity and wellbeing. 

Research shows that there is clear citizen support for solidarity actions and policies in Europe. There is strong evidence of attitudes supporting people in need, reduction of wealth inconsistencies and willingness to support other countries in financial difficulty.

Solidarity is one of the key phenomena studied in the social sciences. Research in sociology, economics, political sciences, and psychology, among others, has been inquiring for many decades into the forms and conditions of social integration and cohesion in order to better understand the social foundations of societies.

European solidarity actions exist, but they are strongly dependent on volunteers and civil society organizations and often manifest themselves at a local level without necessarily finding a strong European articulation. The fragility of solidarity requires a resilience building process to enable long term sustainability of social justice outcomes.

In one statement the Portuguese Internal Affairs Ministry said problems related to migration from outside the EU could only be solved with “solidarity between countries” but highlighted “such solidarity cannot be voluntary”.

“Flexible” but “mandatory solidarity” between EU countries is the key concept Portugal is pushing for, the ministry said.

In march of 2020 the catastrophic situation that was going on in Portugal, namely in Lagos, with many people losing their sources of income. From these concerns, an associative movement arose to feed people in serious need situations. In Lagos the main and predominant economic activity, directly and indirectly, is tourism which suffered a great deal. Around 60,000 people in Portugal who worked in this sector unfortunately have lost their jobs.

Portuguese Ministry of Solidarity, Labours, Social Security and Employment guarantees that every citizen enjoys the universal right to welfare and to retirement pensions. This ministry develops, implements and supports social actions and promotes equal opportunities in childhood, youth, active ageing, dependency and immigration among ethnic minorities and other groups in vulnerable situations. 

The Ministry approves and implements measures which support the family, help people make decisions regarding building a family and reconcile work and family life, and defend children and young people’s rights, preventing situations that might affect their safety, security, health, training, education or complete development.

At times like this Portugal is showing a good example of solidarity in practice to the rest of Europe and improving coherent behavior.

Even in hard times like this with global pandemic when there are a lot of expectations and where Europe is put under a lot of stress, countries stand united and are efficiently solving difficulties that came upon us, cooperating together and showing solidarity and unity to the world. We must remember that every difficulty will pass however hard it might seem and that after we will stand even stronger and more connected after everything.

Mental Health

Mental Health

Author: Fernando

Faced with new realities of working from home, temporary unemployment, home-schooling of children, and lack of physical contact with other family members, friends and colleagues, it is important that we look after our physical health, but make an extra effort to care for our mental health. The mental health toll of COVID-19 is serious and unfortunately long-lasting for some people. It has had a major effect on our lives and still many of us are facing challenges that can be stressful, overwhelming, and cause strong emotions in adults and children. Public health actions, such as social distancing, are necessary to reduce the spread of COVID-19, but they can make us feel isolated and lonely which can increase stress and anxiety.

It is normal to experience a wide range of emotions like fear, worry, and stress. These are normal responses to perceived or real threats, and at times when we are faced with uncertainty or the unknown, it is expected to feel such emotions. So, it is normal and understandable that people are experiencing fear in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

High levels of distress are being experienced by those who say the coronavirus outbreak is a major threat to their personal financial situation or to their personal health. Psychological distress is especially common among adults between 18 to 29, also with those with lower family incomes and those who have a disability or health condition that keeps them from participating fully in work, school, housework or other activities.

And with all of that, unfortunately the topic of suicide became a more heard topic in the news, as many people were severely affected by the pandemic and isolation and quarantine that came with it. As such, mental health became a topic of high importance. 

It was equally hard for children and adolescents, as it was for the adults to handle all the changes in their lives.  People reported feelings of depression, anxiety and with part of the population already suffering with mental health problems before the virus situation, matters only became worse. With economic difficulties on top of that, people were put under such difficult circumstances that many of them couldn’t see a brighter future.

People were searching for different solutions to cope with these hard times. From yoga and meditation, regular video calls with loved ones and therapy people were struggling with the whole situation but trying to cope with it all. Sharing their ways of coping with others, society was showing support like never before. At least we can say that mental health became even less of a taboo topic than before with people simultaneously working together to make a more positive impact and lessen the damage we experienced. 

Since the majority of us were spending a lot of time at home many of our regular social activities were no longer available to us. We should try to see it as a different period in our lives, and not necessarily a bad one, even if we didn’t choose it. Therefore, it was and still is important to focus on our mental health as we continue to be in a world pandemic situation. This is the best reason for us to cultivate a world where we are considerate about how we feel and how the people around us are handling the different challenges they are facing.  On that note COVID-19 mitigation measures present extraordinary challenges in mental healthcare delivery, posing high risk to the mental health of at-risk populations, namely patients diagnosed with COVID-19, frontline healthcare providers, those submitted to quarantine or isolation measures, as well as the general population. Ensuring safe and equitable access to mental healthcare by these groups entails resorting to innovative psychosocial intervention strategies, such as digital mental health. 

As we know the COVID-19 pandemic is a major public health emergency of international concern, however let’s proceed to examine the situation in Portugal. 

Because of the high unpredictability of the outbreak itself, and the uncertainty of its social-economic impact has led to widespread fear, anxiety, and social alarm, posing high risk to the mental health of the Portuguese population.

The first confirmed case was diagnosed on 2nd March 2020, and since then, the spread has been fast, contaminating a lot of people and causing a lot of deaths. 

Therefore, in Portugal, the government declared an emergency state in 18th March 2020, and measures, such as canceling gatherings and events, closing schools, limiting the number of people in public places, for example supermarkets, pharmacies and similar, also recommending social isolation, and mandating homework whenever possible have been taken to reduce contact rates in the general population and reduce transmission. Regarding suspect cases and diagnosed cases, a range of measures have been adopted, such as early identification, contact tracing and monitoring, self-isolation and mandatory quarantines.

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a healthcare crisis in Portugal and continues to create chaos across the world. As we go forward with more protocols or less of them, we should always remember to keep in mind to be conscious of the state of our mental health and overall wellbeing of others. Being mindful and following government regulations should always be a priority in times like this.

Covid-19 and Vaccine

Author: Miha

Economic crisis, protests, lockdowns, government, vaccine, and some other words, which describe year 2020. Worldwide virus, which, as scientist say, comes from Wuhan, China. But is vaccine going to save our lives or not?

Picture 1: Virus vaccine
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

What COVID-19 has brought to us so far?

We are flooded by thousands and thousands information about coronavirus. How come we have not become insane already? There is so many information and we cannot be sure, what to believe anymore. COVID-19 does not seem to be liked by people. In some countries, it has brought protests, human to hate another human, to be disguised by each other, stopped our social life, economy collab and much more. Are we trying to have negative situation? Many people have now got the chance, to rebuild some relationship, to have time for activities and some are happy about being ‘forced’ to stay at home.

Vaccine yes or no?

A lot of people are questioning about vaccine- yes or no, but should we believe government and scientist or not? Currently, there are different companies, all promising with a at least 90% of success to fight against coronavirus. These companies are: Moderna (94,5%), Pfizer (90%), BioNTech (90%), AstraZeneca, University of Oxford, and Russian institute Gamaleja (more than 90%). AstraZeneca and University of Oxford are still in a phase of development. Scientists are not reporting about any side effect, only about redness, pain around the spot, where vaccine was inserted and increase of a temperature for a few days. (Source: https://www.rtvslo.si/zdravje/novi-koronavirus/moderna-cepivo-skoraj-95-odstotno-ucinkovito-prvi-ucinki-cepljenja-vidni-ze-poleti/542473)

Slovenia vs other Europe countries

In Slovenia of the 527 respondents, 16 percent said they would definitely get vaccinated and 28 percent said they would probably get vaccinated. 31 percent of them think that they would probably not be vaccinated, but 26 percent of respondents will certainly not be vaccinated. The ratio in terms of vaccination intent is therefore 43: 57 in the ‘negative ’direction.

Compared to other Europe countries which have more ‘positive’ directions, here are some statistics:

Picture 2: Willingness to be vaccinated against the coronavirus by country
Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10198-020-01208-6/figures/2

 

The latest studies are showing that the virus was present on Italian volunteers…

It is known that the first active case was found in China in December of 2019. Latest Italian scientist confirmed, the coronavirus anti-bodies were found in some of their participants, who volunteered on some lungs cancer research, on September last year, which means, they had coronavirus probably on August 2019, because 14 of them, had anti-bodies from September last year. They had to stop doing the research, when the lockdown happened, this was at the beginning of March. (Source: https://www.24ur.com/novice/korona/novi-koronavirus-se-je-v-italiji-verjetno-pojavil-ze-septembra-lani.html)

When will all of this be over?

I believe, that we are all tired of stressing out on news, orders from government and social distance, but if all of the people come together as one, we can and we certainly will beat this pandemic period.

 

Sources:

https://www.gcc.si/koronavirus/

https://www.24ur.com/novice/korona/novi-koronavirus-se-je-v-italiji-verjetno-pojavil-ze-septembra-lani.html

https://www.rtvslo.si/zdravje/novi-koronavirus/moderna-cepivo-skoraj-95-odstotno-ucinkovito-prvi-ucinki-cepljenja-vidni-ze-poleti/542473

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10198-020-01208-6

https://www.rtvslo.si/slovenija/raziskava-vec-kot-polovica-prebivalcev-se-ne-namerava-cepiti-ko-bo-cepivo-na-voljo/542471

 

Disclaimer

The supporting organizations for the production of these articles do not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the supporting organizations cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein

Flucht vs. Pandemie

Author: Carla

Menschen flüchten über das Mittelmeer, auch wenn die ganze Welt mit Covid-19 beschäftigt ist. Die Seenotrettung kann sich daher keine Pause leisten. Carla Moritz berichtet über die Corona-bedingten Veränderungen im Mittelmeerraum.

Blockaden der Rettungsschiffe, fehlende Landeerlaubnis, keine staatliche Unterstützung: Die Situation für Flüchtende und zivile Seenotretter*innen war schon vor der Corona-Krise erschwert. Durch die Auswirkungen der Pandemie hat sich die Lage weiter verschärft. „Die Corona-Krise hat unsere Arbeit extrem eingeschränkt“, sagt Mattea Weihe, Pressesprecherin der gemeinnützigen Initiative Sea-Watch e.V. In einem Video-Gespräch erzählt sie von den Corona-bedingten Veränderungen, die die zivile Seenotrettung seit März erlebt.

Als Pressesprecherin von Sea-Watch arbeitet Mattea Weihe erst seit kurzem. Zuvor war sie ab 2017 als Teil der Crew bei der Sea-Watch an Board. Aufgrund ihrer Arabisch-Sprachkenntnisse war sie dort als „Cultural Mediator“ die erste Ansprechperson für die Geretteten.

Der durch Spenden finanzierte Verein Sea-Watch e.V. gründete sich 2015, um Flüchtende in Seenot im Mittelmeer zu retten. Ziel des Vereins: Sich selbst abschaffen, denn eigentlich sei die Seenotrettung nicht Aufgabe der Zivilgesellschaft, sagt Weihe. Sea-Watch fordert, dass die Europäische Union für staatliche Seenotrettung und sichere, legale Einreisewege sorgt. Bis dies der Fall ist, sehen sich die Mitglieder des Vereins in der Pflicht, dafür zu sorgen, dass kein Mensch im Mittelmeer sterben muss. Neben Forderungen an die Politik tun sie dies durch den Einsatz zweier Rettungsschiffe im Mittelmeer. Während die Crew in den Anfangsjahren hauptsächlich aus politisch motivierten Aktivist*innen bestand, stechen die Rettungsschiffe heute mit für die Schifffahrt ausgebildeten Freiwilligen und kulturellen Vermittler*innen in See. Dort halten sie Ausschau nach in Seenot geratenen Booten, retten die Passagiere und bringen sie an einen sicheren Hafen. Seit Beginn der Pandemie ist diese Aufgabe durch einige Faktoren erschwert.

Vorbereitung der Einsätze war erst ab Mai wieder möglich

Sea-Watch selbst bezeichnet den Zeitraum zwischen März und Anfang Juni aufgrund logistischer Schwierigkeiten und geschlossener Grenzen als „Zwangspause“ für die Seenotrettung. Mattea Weihe erzählt von den Problemen, die der Verein in dieser Zeit hatte: „Unsere Schiffsoperationen haben sich extrem verzögert: Wir konnten nicht auslaufen, weil bestimmte Arbeiten in den Werften nicht gemacht werden konnten.“ Außerdem habe die Crew wegen der Reisebeschränkungen und der Einschränkung des Flugverkehrs nicht rechtzeitig da sein können.

Erst im Mai sei die Vorbereitung von Einsätzen wieder möglich gewesen. Der Verein hat ein Hygiene-Konzept entwickelt, um die Crew und die Geretteten vor einer möglichen Covid-19-Ansteckung zu schützen: Vor und nach Einsätzen begeben sich die Crewmitglieder jeweils zwei Wochen in Kleingruppen in Quarantäne. Außerdem arbeiten sie komplett in Schutzanzügen. „Das hat unsere Rettungsaktionen extrem anstrengend gemacht und ist eine große Herausforderung“ so Weihe. An Bord werden die Geretteten sofort mit Mund-Nasen-Schutz ausgestattet. Alle sollen auf eine regelmäßige Desinfektion der Hände und Geräte achten. „Wir versuchen außerdem, dass der Abstand zwischen den Menschen eingehalten wird, um eine Ansteckung in jede Richtung zu vermeiden.“ Warum dies auf einem Schiff mit 200 Geretteten und der Crew schwierig ist, braucht sie nicht zu erklären.

Menschen fliehen trotz globaler Pandemie

Während Deutschland mit der Bewältigung von Covid-19 beschäftigt war, blieb kaum noch Zeit über die Flucht im Mittelmeerraum zu berichten. Bei vielen folgte der Trugschluss: Die Pandemie habe nicht nur unsere Reisen und tägliches Leben zeitweise pausiert, sondern auch für weniger flüchtende Menschen gesorgt.

Doch Weihe schildert das Gegenteil: „Wenn Menschen ihr Land auf Grund von Krieg, Folter oder anderer Schwierigkeiten verlassen müssen, wird sie auch keine Pandemie davon abhalten. Wir sehen von den Zahlen der flüchtenden Menschen her überhaupt keine Veränderung.“

Diesen Eindruck bestätigen auch die Zahlen der Europäischen Agentur für die Grenz- und Küstenwache Frontex. Laut Medienberichten kam es zwar im April zu einem starken Rückgang bei der Zahl der flüchtenden Menschen, im Mai seien aber wieder mehr Menschen über das Mittelmeer geflohen.

Corona-Pandemie als europäische „Über-Ausrede“

Doch während sich die Zahlen nicht verändert haben, habe die zivile Seenotrettung mittlerweile noch mehr Probleme bei der Erteilung von Landeerlaubnissen als vor der Pandemie. „Die europäische Politik nutzt die Pandemie massiv als Ausrede, Menschenrechte zu verletzen“ sagt Weihe.

Laut dem Deutschen Institut für Menschenrechte müssen folgende Rechte eingehalten werden, auch während der Corona-Pandemie:

  • Rettung aus Seenot: „Alle Schiffe, die im Mittelmeer unterwegs sind müssen Schutzbedürftige in Seenot aufnehmen und an einen sicheren Ort bringen. Kein Schiff darf dabei behindert werden.
  • Aufnahme in EU: Schiffe unter dem Kommando der EU und ihrer Mitgliedstaaten dürfen Schutzsuchende nicht in Drittstaaten, zum Beispiel Libyen, Marokko oder Tunesien, zurückbringen.
  • Schiffe von Drittstaaten z.B. lybische Küstenwache: Schiffe von Drittstaaten müssen Schutzsuchende an einen sicheren Ort bringen. Gerettete dürfen nicht in geschlossene Lager in Libyen gebracht werden. […]
  • Übergabe von Geretteten: Werden Kapitäne angewiesen, aus Seenot geborgene Menschen an die libysche Küstenwache zu übergeben oder Menschen auf See von der libyschen Küstenwache abgedrängt und zurück nach Libyen gebracht, ist das menschen- und seerechtswidrig.“

Während die zivile Seenotrettung pausieren musste, war vor allem die libysche Küstenwache im Mittelmeer aktiv. Laut dem Deutschen Institut für Menschenrechte bringt diese Gerettete oft in geschlossene Lager.

Laut Weihe werden die Menschen- und Seerechte schon länger von den Mitgliedsländern der Europäischen Union ignoriert. Dabei habe man in der Corona-Krise nun eine „Über-Ausrede“ gefunden, „damit kein Mensch, der nicht aus Europa kommt, einen Fuß auf den Boden dieses Kontinents setzt“. Die Pandemie werde genutzt, um das Recht auf Flucht zu verwehren. „In Griechenland durften Menschen wegen der Pandemie nicht an Land gehen, und es wurde erwartet, dass die Türkei sie zurücknimmt“, so Weihe.

Besonders schwierig sei die Kommunikation zwischen Seenotrettenden und zuständigen Rettungsleitstellen auf Malta: „Das Land macht keine Anstalten noch in der Seenotrettung aktiv zu sein und lässt Menschen wochenlang auf kleinen Schiffen ausharren.“ Ein weiteres Problem: Auf der italienischen Insel Sizilien hatte der Regionalpräsident ein Dekret veröffentlicht, dass eine Schließung aller Aufnahmezentren und die Aufnahme von weiteren Migrant*innen verbot. Schlussendlich blieb das Dekret ohne Auswirkungen, da die Entscheidung nicht in die Verantwortung der Region ist. Dennoch: die Begründung für das angekündigte Verbot war die Corona-Krise.

Eine neue Tendenz sei es, geflüchtete Menschen auf sogenannten Quarantäne-Fähren unterzubringen, erklärt Weihe. Auch die Schiffe der Sea-Watch übergeben ihre Geretteten nun an die umfunktionierten Verkehrsmittel. Mattea Weihe sieht dies kritisch: „Ob es menschlich ist, Menschen auf Fähren zu halten, darüber kann man streiten“.

Der Pressesprecher des Bundesinnenministeriums Steve Alter erklärte Anfang April, man sei sich der schwierigen Situation der EU-Mitgliedstaaten am Mittelmeer durchaus bewusst: „Wir haben […] die Information erhalten, dass es vor dem Hintergrund der aktuellen Situation um Corona nicht möglich sein wird, Rettungsschiffe anlanden zu lassen und eine Ausschiffung zu ermöglichen.“ Mit dem Anspruch „verantwortlich zu handeln“ habe man daher Rettungsorganisationen unter deutscher Flagge wie z.B. Sea-Watch über dieses Problem informiert. Weitere Maßnahmen der Bundesregierung oder EU wurden nicht genannt.

Der Verein Sea-Watch wird laut Weihe auch trotz der Pandemie weitermachen. „Wir finden es richtig, dass Corona ernst genommen wird, aber es kann nicht sein, dass deswegen Menschen im Mittelmeer ertrinken müssen“. Wenn die europäischen Länder sich weigern, gerettete Flüchtende aufzunehmen, kann der Verein keinen neuen Einsatz vorbereiten.

Unser Gespräch fand drei Tage vor den Bränden im Flüchtlingslager Moria auf der griechischen Insel Lesbos statt, die Aufmerksamkeit für die Probleme Flüchtender an der europäischen Grenze erzeugten.

 

Carla Moritz

 

Disclaimer

The supporting organizations for the production of these articles do not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the supporting organizations cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein

WANTED: European Solidarity

Author:

The EU is playing treasure hunt: The treasure is solidarity among the member states, the cornerstone of the EU. In times of corona this treasure got lost because the players – also known as the EU member states – decided to go into lockdown. politikorange editor Lisa-Marie thinks: That was maybe well-meant but for sure badly done.

Photo: Ingo Doerrie / Unsplash

How a crisis made the EU forget about its cornerstone

Flashback to mid-March: Most EU member states went into lockdown within a few days in order to protect the people living in their states. They suspended the freedoms coming with the Schengen Agreement. According to a survey for the European Commission from 2019, EU citizens believe that this agreement is the greatest European achievement of all. One quote by Franc But, the Slovenian Ambassador to Berlin, sums up what many politicians from different countries say about the closure of the internal EU-borders:

It was not friendly, not European, but totally necessary.

Not only has this shown how a pandemic can drastically change the European priorities: The number of confirmed corona cases was increasing. Many people were afraid. The situation was new to everyone, but politicians had to react quickly and present solutions to the people on how to fight the virus. Under time pressure closing the borders might have seemed like the best solution to regain a feeling of control. Nevertheless, it is more than debatable whether it was really helpful.

Why border closure is not the best measure

This virus knows no borders.

With these words, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen underlined the importance of togetherness when talking about a vaccine against the coronavirus. However, what she said and what the EU did could not be more contradictory. The EU member states should have taken her message more seriously.

In order to lower the number of corona cases, it was most essential that people practiced social distancing, which is generally difficult for people because humans are social beings that are used to being in contact with others. And even if people manage to deal with that – it is still extremely hard for many to prevent being in contact with others due to their work. Nevertheless, during corona a „normal“ social life is not possible. Closing the borders aimed at preventing people from other countries from infecting the citizens in their own country. But people inside one country could still infect each other. Border closures cannot make people respect the distance rules in general – it only prevents them from crossing borders.

As a result, the harm the border closure created may be greater than the benefit: The EU member states could have shown that they could solve the crisis together by cooperation and common measures. Instead, they created not just a physical but also a mental separation. There was no solidarity among the member states but mostly egoism. This was especially hard for the people living directly at the Schengen borders. Usually living nearby the internal EU-borders is living Europe. During the closure, people there really got to feel the restrictions. It should be a top priority now to reopen the borders and learn from what has happened. It is time to remember that the European Union is really meant to act as a union to solve crises in the future. Hopefully, the EU will find and keep this treasure in the future.

Disclaimer

The supporting organizations for the production of these articles do not constitute an endorsement of the contents, which reflect the views only of the authors, and the supporting organizations cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein